\documentclass[a4paper, 6pt]{report}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{longtable}

\begin{document}

\begin{center}

\begin{longtable}{ | p{8cm} | p{8cm} | }

\caption{\textbf{SWOT analysis of the governance capacity of RI-RACIO, 2014}} \\


\hline
\textbf{Strengths} & \textbf{Weaknesses} \\
\hline

\multirow{1}{*}{}  & \\
                   \textbf{S1.} The management structure is adequate to a big institution. Control of the RACIO actions is also provided. & \textbf{W1.} Lack of rules for a government in a case of long-term existence of RATIO: how elections will be organized, who elects, duration of one mandate, how many mandates one person could be in the governing body of RACIO, etc. \\
                   \textbf{S2.} Experienced management body. & \textbf{W2.} Not good correlation between the “Statutes” and the ``Management structure''. \\
                   \textbf{S3.} Awareness of the governing body in the responsibilities related to the role of RACIO as a leading RI in its field. & \textbf{W3.} Since the actions of RACIO concerns many researchers in 3 institutions, their vote should be taken into account. 12 representatives in the General Council (including 6 only from IA and NAO, who is the main contributor of infrastructure, technical and human resources) is a too small number. \\
                   \textbf{S4.} Team oriented style of work. & \textbf{W4.} No younger researchers in the RACIO government. \\
                   \textbf{S5.} Contacts with different national institutions and with institutions in EU. & \textbf{W5.} Lack of system of rules for control and stimulus for the technical and support staff. \\
                   \textbf{S6.} The action plan is adequate to the goals. & \\
                    & \\


\hline

\textbf{Opportunities} & \textbf{Threats} \\
\hline

\multirow{1}{*}{}  & \\
                   \textbf{O1.} Including in the ``Statutes'' chapter for the mandate duration and elections rules. The General Council to be elected by the whole RACIO members. Increase of the number of representatives. & \textbf{T1.} Insufficient funding from the BAS budget. No funding for RACIO during the last years. \\
                   \textbf{O2.} To precise the ``Statutes'' and the ``Management structure''. & \textbf{T2.} Problems with non-regularly funding of the projects we won. \\
                   \textbf{O3.} Involvement of younger researchers in management. Creation of next generation managers. & \textbf{T3.} Lack of money and financial crisis. \\
                   \textbf{O4.} Better management of the technical and support staff. Elaboration of rules for evaluation and stimulus. & \textbf{T4.} No regular information for the future of the RI and eventual funding. \\
                   \textbf{O5.} Flexible work with the budget when possible. Negotiations with the trade partners under contracts where possible. & \\
                   & \\

\hline


\end{longtable}
\end{center}

\end{document}